Light ROM 4/Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso/text/maillist/1995/0895.doc/000031_owner-lightwav…bcom.webcom.com_Sun Aug 6 08:14:07 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-09-02 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA170692046; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 08:14:07 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us by webcom.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA170622042; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 08:14:02 -0700
Received: (from tstethem@localhost) by linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us (8.6.12/8.6.9) id IAA25486; Sun, 6 Aug 1995 08:04:57 -0700
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 1995 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Stethem <[e-mail]>
To: LightWaveMailingList <[e-mail]>
Subject: Intel Triton Chipset?
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

  I am trying to get a little clarification on the chipset matter before
I make the plunge into a Pentium PC as a LW platform. There has been some
discussion of the Intel support chipset requiring the cache disabling to
run Lightwave under WindowsNT.
  I remember reading about some problems with the Intel support chips a
few months ago and I have been trying to find that article with no
success.
  What I was wondering if the support chips in question are the Triton
chipset? I am getting the impression that the Triton chipset is a NEW
chipset, maybe to correct the original chipset problems? I see ads now
for a Triton chipset upgrade and many of the Pentium ads point out using the
Triton chipset on the motherboard as if it is a significant feature.
  Does anybody know anymore about this?
--
Ted Stethem <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]